May 19, 2023
In reply an excerpt from Letter to the Editor to NATURE, Volume 360, 26 November 1992, page 292 at: https://www.whatisclimate.com/1992-nature.html
QUOTE. What is the point of a legal term if it explains nothing? For decades, the real question has been who is responsible for the climate. Climate should have been defined as ‘the continuation of the oceans by other means’. Thus, the 1982 Convention could long since have been used to protect the climate. After all, it is the most powerful tool with which to force politicians and the community of states into actions. UNQUOTE
If interested read also:
“People defend your ‘climate’ – as you use it for 2000 years; Weather and climate are everyday slang words and misleading when used by science.” At:
