Is it good or bad to write „doom and gloom climate articles”? I think yes, if it is not about the Atlantic or the AMOC, but about the papers climatologist produce about these topics, and the threads they claim to see. It is a miracle how they are able to do it with the few data they have. Two year ago I discussed an article by the NYT, the New York Times, (March 03, 2021) (the reference NATURE), here

https://medium.com/@oceansgovernclimate/for-science-the-north-atlantic-is-a-too-big-case-58f111c4895b

with the conclusion that the claims presented “rely on freewheeling assumptions and consideration.”