It seems of little help is you say, „ Climate change refers to the change in the environmental conditions of the earth"; without explaining first what “environmental conditions” comprise.
Talking in this way is as meaningless as the UNFCCC (Art 1, para2) : “
"Climate change" means a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods.”
The FCCC fails to define CLIMATE, so what is a change of ‘nothing’, and tops the nonsense by explaining: "Climate change" means a change of climate which is……s.a.), while the rest in in no way any better.
A recent response at https://oceansgovernclimate.medium.com/what-are-the-causes-and-effects-of-climate-change-39d411745904 , reads as follows:
QUOTE
What are the causes and effects of Climate Change?
The best answer is: Water, water and water! As the oceans hold almost all global water, respectively: “Climate is the ocean; the ocean is climate”. The Glasgow Climate Pact Article 61 calls for “an annual ‘ocean-climate dialogue’. That is by far too little!
It highly urgent to demand a rework of the UNFCCC, which lacks a definition on “climate”, and thereby prevents to understand that: climate is the continuation of the ocean by other means. This statement can be found in a letter to NATUR, 1992, see the full text at;
http://www.whatisclimate.com/1992-nature.html
The most urgent demand should be that climate science is using terms and a language which names the facts clear and understandable, because weather and climate are everyday slang words and misleading when used by science. Disused at:
“Climate is a big issue, but science cannot say what it is”.; discussed here
https://oceansgovernclimate.com/climate-is-a-big-issue-but-science-cannot-say-what-it-is/
Best wishes for a healthy and fulfilling YEAR 2022!
UNQUOTE
