NYT too narrow on climate change matters?

Sometimes THE NEW YORK TIMES addresses its readers with the request: The Times needs your voice. We welcome your on-topic commentary, criticism and expertise. Comments are moderated for civility. That happened also with an article on Dec.30/2020 titled: “What’s on the Horizon for the Climate Desk”. A brief comment was send twice, on 4 and 5 January, which read at it follows:


I fully understand the NYT’s clear position on the climate issue. It is less acceptable if important questions that urgently need clarification are therefore excluded. This includes at least three important complexes that are very important for a sustainable climate discussion, namely

1. Were humans involved in Early Arctic Warming from 1918 to 1939? https://oceansgovernclimate.com/is-man-the-source-of-the-early-arctic-warming/

2. Was the Second World War one of the reasons for the global cooling that occurred in the war winter of 1939/40, lasting until about mid-1970s.

See Chapter C (about 40 pages) at http://www.seaclimate.com/

3. Should climate research be allowed to get away with using the layman’s term “climate” without being able to define it in a scientifically comprehensible way? http://www.whatisclimate.com/

Please accept the brevity of my contribution and kindly take note of the attached Links.
I am ready to answer your questions.


The submission was confirmed but not published. Wondering and concerned that the NYT may handle the climatic change issue too narrowly the following mail letter was sent on 6th of January:


To the EDITOR in Chief…………. 6th January 2021…etc.… .

Dear Madam or Sir,

The Climate Desk requested readers to comment to the article, on climate change matters. My brief comment, as attached, and definitely received by the NYT, was not published, although the comment complies with the article’s perspective, and is not “uncivilized”.

In order to dispel any suspicion that the reporting on climatic change matters of the NYT has little interest in painting the most complete picture possible of the climate complex and not to exclude important and unanswered questions, I would appreciate to get your kind explanation, concerning the not accepted comment. Thanks.






Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

I am here to help…

Towards sustainable cocoa

Skydiving builds bridges and can spread environmentally sustainable stoke!

Wetpour Daily Mile Surfaces in Hampshire #Wetpour #Daily #Mile #Track #Hampshire https://t.co/6B01YI

Rockslides & Revelation on the River of Sorrows

Beneath the Ice

S01 E02 Leaders in sustainability — Portrait of Catherine Sorbara

Feeding Tomorrow’s World — Creating a Blockchain-powered Agriculture platform

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Dr. Arnd Bernaerts

Dr. Arnd Bernaerts


More from Medium

Want to Move Forward in your Life? Shift your Focus from ‘Why’ to ‘What Now’

Property and Nature

Physical Therapy and Honest Communication

Shattered Wings: The Story of a Pigeon